JUDICIAL CASE FLOW MANAGEMENT “CHECKPOINT”: HOW FAR HAVE WE GONE?

Authors

  • Selby Mfanelo Mbenenge Judge President of the Eastern Cape Division of the High Court

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v45i2.19028

Keywords:

judicial case flow management, historical perspective, Uniform Rules of Court, norms and standards, inquisitorial role

Abstract

This article examines the introduction of judicial case flow management into South African law from a historical perspective, its initial failures, resistance and fundamental principles. It sets out the judicial attempts to regulate the management of litigious matters through the Uniform Rules of Court, particularly rule 37A, and the impact of the introduction of the era of norms and standards on case flow management. Through revelations in practice of the positive progress achieved in judicial case flow management, the central argument is that a more inquisitorial role in the case flow management system is key to ensuring access to justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

07-07-2024

How to Cite

Selby Mfanelo Mbenenge. (2024). JUDICIAL CASE FLOW MANAGEMENT “CHECKPOINT”: HOW FAR HAVE WE GONE?. Obiter, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v45i2.19028

Issue

Section

Articles