THE DEFENCE OF INHERENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE JOB: A BLANKET BAN FOR MEDICAL REASONS NOT JUSTIFIABLE IMATU v City of Cape Town (2005) 14 LC 6.12.2*

Authors

  • Adriaan van der Walt
  • Glynis van der Walt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v26i2.14765

Keywords:

imposing a blanket ban, employment of diabetics, position of firefighters, risk for the sufferer

Abstract

The Labour Court was faced with the question of whether the respondent in this case was justified in imposing a blanket ban on the employment of diabetics in the position of firefighters on the basis that the condition in itself posed a serious risk for the sufferer, as well as the public at large, where the individual was called upon to work in hazardous and stressful conditions. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

13-09-2022

How to Cite

Adriaan van der Walt, & Glynis van der Walt. (2022). THE DEFENCE OF INHERENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE JOB: A BLANKET BAN FOR MEDICAL REASONS NOT JUSTIFIABLE IMATU v City of Cape Town (2005) 14 LC 6.12.2*. Obiter, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v26i2.14765

Issue

Section

Cases

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>