THE DEFENCE OF INHERENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE JOB: A BLANKET BAN FOR MEDICAL REASONS NOT JUSTIFIABLE IMATU v City of Cape Town (2005) 14 LC 6.12.2*
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v26i2.14765Keywords:
imposing a blanket ban, employment of diabetics, position of firefighters, risk for the suffererAbstract
The Labour Court was faced with the question of whether the respondent in this case was justified in imposing a blanket ban on the employment of diabetics in the position of firefighters on the basis that the condition in itself posed a serious risk for the sufferer, as well as the public at large, where the individual was called upon to work in hazardous and stressful conditions.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
13-09-2022
Issue
Section
Cases
How to Cite
THE DEFENCE OF INHERENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE JOB: A BLANKET BAN FOR MEDICAL REASONS NOT JUSTIFIABLE IMATU v City of Cape Town (2005) 14 LC 6.12.2*. (2022). Obiter, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v26i2.14765