DEBT COUNSELLING V DEBT ENFORCEMENT: SOME PROCEDURAL QUESTIONS ANSWERED BMW Financial Services (SA) (Pty) Ltd v Donkin 2009 6 SA 63 (KZD)

Authors

  • Corlia van Heerden
  • Hermie Coetzee

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v31i3.12341

Keywords:

debt enforcement, debt review

Abstract

The National Credit Act 34 of 2005 (hereinafter the “NCA” or “Act”) is an innovative but challenging piece of legislation. It provides for various novel approaches to debt enforcement in respect of credit agreements and has introduced debt-relief measures in respect of over-indebtedness and reckless credit that are new to South African consumer credit legislation. It is thus inevitable that in applying the provisions of the Act various issues will arise that will require interpretation and, therefore, intense scrutiny. In the recent judgment of BMW Financial Services (SA) (Pty) Ltd v Donkin, Wallis J was required to scrutinize various aspects relating to debt review and debt enforcement in order to decide the consumer’s fate as influenced by the NCA (66; and see also s 130(1)(a)).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

15-09-2021

Issue

Section

Cases

How to Cite

DEBT COUNSELLING V DEBT ENFORCEMENT: SOME PROCEDURAL QUESTIONS ANSWERED BMW Financial Services (SA) (Pty) Ltd v Donkin 2009 6 SA 63 (KZD). (2021). Obiter, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v31i3.12341