WHEN A RELATIONSHIP HAS REACHED ITS EXPIRATION DATE, DOES THE SAME APPLY TO THE EMBRYOS UNDER SOUTH AFRICAN LAW?

Authors

  • C van Niekerk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v38i1.11508

Keywords:

recourse, assisted reproductive technologies, frozen embryos, disputes

Abstract

Individuals are more frequently having recourse to assisted reproductive technologies (ART) to realize their desire for offspring. Where they do so, they may choose to fertilize their gametes and implant the resultant embryos immediately, or they may choose to freeze their embryos for later use. The latter option brings with it greater potential for legal disputes as relationships terminate, parties change their minds, and disagreements arise regarding the fate of frozen embryos. This article, therefore, examines the South African legal framework for addressing disputes involving frozen embryos. The aim is to assess whether the current legal framework is adequate, and whether lessons can be learnt from other jurisdictions faced with similar legal disputes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

01-04-2017

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

WHEN A RELATIONSHIP HAS REACHED ITS EXPIRATION DATE, DOES THE SAME APPLY TO THE EMBRYOS UNDER SOUTH AFRICAN LAW?. (2017). Obiter, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v38i1.11508