The Ethics of Legal Practitioners in Resource-Scarce Institutions ‒ PM Mashishi v Z Mdlala [2018] 17 BLLR 693 (LC); (2018) 39 ILJ 1607 (LC)

Authors

  • Nicola Whitear
  • Helen Kruuse

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v40i2.11270

Keywords:

hopeless or unarguable cases, abuse of process, punitive costs order, order of forfeiture of fees, limited resources, backlogs, resource-scarce institutions, ethical conduct

Abstract

We consider what the court says in relation to hopeless cases in resource-scarce institutions, and consider how we could understand the required ethical conduct of legal practitioners in these situations better – specifically with reference to William Simon’s “ethical discretion” approach to lawyering. Simon’s critique of contemporary legal ethics in the United States appears to be particularly apt in the circumstances of the Mashishi case – specifically on the perceived amorality of the lawyer’s adversarial role, which results in an uninhibited pursuit of client ends, so long as they are arguably within the law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

02-10-2019

Issue

Section

Cases

How to Cite

The Ethics of Legal Practitioners in Resource-Scarce Institutions ‒ PM Mashishi v Z Mdlala [2018] 17 BLLR 693 (LC); (2018) 39 ILJ 1607 (LC). (2019). Obiter, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v40i2.11270