Duress by Indirect Circumstances in English and South African Law: A Comparison – R v Brandford [2017] 2 All ER 43; [2016] EWCA Crim 1794

Authors

  • Samantha Goosen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v41i4.10499

Keywords:

duress, indirect threats, direct threats, defence in criminal law

Abstract

While duress by means of direct threats can provide a defence in criminal law, the legal question is whether threats conveyed indirectly are capable of providing a valid defence in criminal law. More specifically, can indirect threats then also be used as a means of defending another party’s interests that are under attack? There appears to be both academic support and precedent to answer this question in the affirmative. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

25-03-2021

How to Cite

Samantha Goosen. (2021). Duress by Indirect Circumstances in English and South African Law: A Comparison – R v Brandford [2017] 2 All ER 43; [2016] EWCA Crim 1794. Obiter, 41(4), 974–987. https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v41i4.10499

Issue

Vol. 41 No. 4 (2020)

Section

Cases

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Samantha Goosen

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.